If you run trucks for a living, insurance is not just paperwork. It decides whether your business survives a serious accident, cargo loss, or lawsuit. When coverage fails at the moment you need it most, the impact can be brutal. Delayed claims, denied payouts, confusing policy language, and poor communication can leave drivers paying out of pocket or parking trucks indefinitely.
When people ask what the worst trucking insurance companies are, they are usually not looking for the cheapest quote. They are trying to avoid insurers with long complaint histories, poor claims handling, unstable underwriting, or limited understanding of commercial trucking risks. Based on complaint trends, regulatory actions, driver feedback, and industry reporting, some insurers repeatedly appear in negative conversations across the trucking sector.
Below is a detailed breakdown of trucking insurers that are frequently criticized by owner operators, fleet managers, and freight brokers. These companies are legitimate, licensed providers, but many drivers report serious frustrations once a claim is filed.
10 Poorly Rated Trucking Insurance Companies Truckers Often Avoid
Before breaking down each insurer in detail, here is a high level comparison table to give you a clear snapshot of why these companies are often viewed unfavorably by trucking professionals.
| Insurance Company | Common Complaints | Coverage Concerns | Claims Experience |
| Progressive Commercial | Aggressive rate hikes, slow claims | Tight underwriting rules | Delays and disputes |
| Sentry Insurance | Poor communication | Limited flexibility | Lengthy investigations |
| Great West Casualty | Expensive premiums | Strict eligibility | Slow settlements |
| Canal Insurance | Minimal policy options | Narrow coverage | High denial rates |
| Northland Insurance | Inconsistent service | Policy confusion | Long processing times |
| Lancer Insurance | Driver eligibility issues | Sudden cancellations | Limited explanations |
| Hallmark Insurance | Financial instability | Coverage gaps | Settlement delays |
| AmTrust Financial | Claims outsourcing | Poor transparency | Disputed payouts |
| Occidental Fire & Casualty | Regional limitations | Outdated policies | Slow response |
| Berkshire Hathaway GUARD | Rigid underwriting | Complex endorsements | Documentation hurdles |
Each of these insurers shows patterns that make them risky choices for trucking businesses, especially those operating on tight margins.
Progressive Commercial Insurance
Progressive Commercial is one of the most recognized names in trucking coverage, especially for new authority holders. While their marketing makes them appear trucker friendly, many drivers report frustration after signing the policy.
One of the most common complaints involves sharp premium increases after the first policy term. New operators often start with an affordable rate, only to face steep renewals once Progressive reviews driving data, inspections, or claims history. Even minor incidents can trigger higher deductibles or coverage restrictions.
Claims handling is another frequent issue. Drivers report long response times, repeated document requests, and adjusters who lack trucking specific knowledge. In cargo damage cases, disputes over load valuation are common, leaving carriers stuck between customers and insurers.
Progressive also enforces strict underwriting guidelines. Drivers with older equipment, mixed hauling operations, or inconsistent mileage often struggle to maintain coverage. Policy cancellations mid term, while legal, can cripple small fleets overnight.
Sentry Insurance
Sentry Insurance has a long history in commercial lines, including trucking. However, its reputation among truckers is mixed, leaning negative for many owner operators.
Communication problems are frequently mentioned. Policyholders describe difficulty reaching claims adjusters, slow callbacks, and vague explanations regarding coverage decisions. In trucking, where downtime costs money daily, slow responses can mean missed contracts and unpaid drivers.
Sentry policies also tend to be less flexible. Coverage endorsements for specialized hauling, such as refrigerated freight or hazardous materials, may require extensive documentation. Any discrepancy can result in claim disputes or partial denials.
Claims investigations often drag on longer than expected. Accident reconstructions, logbook reviews, and driver interviews can delay payouts for months, creating cash flow issues for small carriers.
Great West Casualty Company
Great West Casualty is well known in the trucking world and often targets larger fleets. While financially stable, it is frequently criticized for high premiums and rigid requirements.
Smaller operators often find Great West unaffordable. Even drivers with clean records report higher base rates compared to competitors. Deductibles can also be steep, making minor claims impractical to file.
Underwriting rules are strict. Drivers with limited experience, prior claims, or non standard routes may be declined outright. Once insured, policy changes can be slow and require extensive approval processes.
Claims handling tends to favor thorough investigation over speed. While this protects the insurer, it often frustrates truckers who need quick resolutions to return trucks to service.
Canal Insurance Company
Canal Insurance is a specialty provider focused on commercial trucking. Despite its niche focus, it receives significant criticism from drivers and brokers alike.
One major issue is limited coverage options. Canal policies are often bare bones, requiring multiple endorsements to achieve adequate protection. Many drivers discover gaps only after filing a claim.
Claims denial rates are a recurring concern. Policy language is highly technical, and exclusions are strictly enforced. Cargo claims, in particular, are frequently disputed due to valuation disagreements or alleged policy violations.
Customer service is another weak point. Policyholders report difficulty getting clear answers, especially during renewals or claims disputes. For drivers operating across multiple states, Canal’s narrow underwriting appetite can be restrictive.
Northland Insurance
Northland Insurance, part of the Travelers group, provides commercial trucking coverage but often draws mixed reviews from policyholders.
One common issue is inconsistent service quality. Some drivers report smooth experiences, while others face delays and confusion. This inconsistency makes it hard to predict how claims will be handled.
Policy documents can be complex, with multiple endorsements and exclusions. Drivers unfamiliar with insurance terminology may misunderstand what is covered, leading to unpleasant surprises during claims.
Claims processing times are frequently cited as slow, especially for liability cases involving third parties. Extended investigations and repeated documentation requests add stress during already difficult situations.
Lancer Insurance Company
Lancer Insurance is known for insuring higher risk trucking operations, including new authorities and specialized haulers. While this makes coverage accessible, it also comes with drawbacks.
Driver eligibility standards can change suddenly. Truckers report policy cancellations or non renewals due to minor violations or inspection issues. These decisions often come with limited explanation.
Premiums can increase sharply after inspections or claims, even when the driver is not at fault. This unpredictability makes budgeting difficult for small fleets.
Claims support is another concern. Drivers describe limited guidance during the claims process and difficulty reaching knowledgeable adjusters. This lack of support can prolong downtime and increase out of pocket costs.
Hallmark Insurance Group
Hallmark Insurance has faced financial challenges in recent years, raising concerns among trucking professionals.
Financial instability often leads to delayed claim payments. Drivers report waiting extended periods for settlements, particularly for property damage and cargo losses.
Coverage gaps are another issue. Policies may appear comprehensive but include exclusions that limit real world protection. These gaps often become evident only after an incident occurs.
Hallmark’s underwriting appetite has also shifted, leading to non renewals for certain trucking operations. Sudden loss of coverage can disrupt contracts and compliance requirements.
AmTrust Financial Services
AmTrust Financial is a large commercial insurer offering trucking coverage through various subsidiaries. While widely used, it has drawn criticism for claims handling practices.
One common complaint is the outsourcing of claims management. Policyholders often deal with third party administrators who may lack trucking expertise. This can result in miscommunication and inconsistent decisions.
Transparency is another issue. Drivers report difficulty understanding why claims are denied or reduced. Detailed explanations are often lacking, making appeals challenging.
Settlement disputes are also frequent, particularly in workers compensation and liability cases involving drivers. Lengthy negotiations can strain relationships with employees and clients.
Occidental Fire and Casualty Company
Occidental Fire and Casualty, often referred to as Ocas, operates mainly in specific regions. While legitimate, it has limitations that frustrate many truckers.
Regional restrictions can affect coverage availability. Drivers operating interstate routes may face exclusions or higher premiums outside approved zones.
Policy structures are often described as outdated, with limited customization for modern trucking operations. This rigidity can lead to coverage mismatches.
Response times during claims are another concern. Drivers report slow acknowledgment of claims and delayed inspections, increasing downtime.
Berkshire Hathaway GUARD Insurance Companies
Berkshire Hathaway GUARD benefits from a strong parent brand, but its trucking insurance arm is not without criticism.
Underwriting standards are rigid, particularly for owner operators and small fleets. Minor discrepancies in applications can lead to declines or policy cancellations.
Policy endorsements are complex and heavily documented. Understanding coverage often requires professional assistance, increasing administrative costs.
Claims handling is thorough but slow. Documentation requirements are extensive, and delays are common, especially in liability cases involving multiple parties.
Explore more articles and company reviews on our homepage.
Why These Trucking Insurers Often Rank Poorly
Across these companies, several patterns emerge that explain why truckers struggle with certain insurers.
- Claims processes that prioritize investigation over speed
- Strict policy language that limits real world coverage
- Poor communication during critical moments
- Sudden rate increases or cancellations
- Limited understanding of specific hauling operations
For example, a refrigerated carrier hauling perishable goods cannot afford delayed cargo claim decisions. A flatbed operator facing a liability lawsuit needs immediate legal support. When insurers fail in these moments, trust erodes quickly.
What Truckers Should Watch For When Choosing Coverage
Understanding why some insurers perform poorly helps drivers avoid repeating the same mistakes.
Look closely at claims handling reputation, not just price. An affordable premium means little if payouts are delayed or denied. Review complaint ratios filed with state insurance departments and talk to other drivers in similar operations.
Policy clarity matters. Ask for written explanations of exclusions, deductibles, and endorsements. If something seems unclear before purchase, it will likely cause issues later.
Financial stability is also critical. Insurers facing financial pressure may delay settlements or tighten underwriting suddenly, leaving policyholders exposed.
Conclusion
The worst trucking insurance companies are not always the ones with the lowest prices or the loudest advertising. They are the insurers that fail drivers when accidents happen, cargo is damaged, or lawsuits arise. Slow claims, rigid underwriting, and poor communication can cost trucking businesses far more than higher premiums ever would.
Choosing the right insurer requires more than comparing quotes. It means understanding how a company treats truckers after the policy is issued. Learning from the experiences of others helps drivers protect their livelihoods and avoid insurers that repeatedly leave policyholders frustrated and financially strained.
Explore: The 10 Worst Dental Insurance Companies
Frequently Asked Questions
How do trucking insurance complaints affect freight contracts and broker approvals
Many freight brokers and shippers check a carrier’s insurance provider before awarding loads. If an insurer has a reputation for slow claims or frequent disputes, brokers may require higher liability limits, additional endorsements, or even refuse to work with that carrier. This can reduce load options and force truckers to accept lower paying routes.
Can switching trucking insurers mid policy cause compliance or legal issues
Switching providers before a policy term ends is legal, but it can create gaps if not handled carefully. Federal filings such as BMC 91 or BMC 34 must be updated immediately, and any lapse can result in authority suspension. Some insurers also report cancellations quickly, which may trigger broker red flags or contract reviews.
Why do some trucking insurance companies deny claims even after accepting premiums
Premium payments only keep the policy active; they do not guarantee claim approval. Many denials occur due to exclusions related to cargo type, driver qualifications, route deviations, or late reporting. Insurers with rigid policy language tend to enforce these exclusions more aggressively, leaving drivers surprised when claims are rejected.
Does a high complaint history mean an insurer is unsafe or unreliable
A high number of complaints does not always mean financial instability, but it often signals service problems. Frequent complaints usually point to delays, poor communication, or unclear coverage terms. For trucking businesses that depend on fast claim resolution, these service issues can be just as damaging as an outright denial.
How can owner operators protect themselves when dealing with poorly rated insurers
Owner operators can reduce risk by keeping detailed trip records, maintaining inspection ready equipment, and reporting incidents immediately. Working with a broker who understands commercial trucking coverage also helps. Clear documentation and proactive communication often prevent insurers from disputing claims later.
