If you’re running a small or mid sized business, cash flow gaps can feel stressful fast. Factoring often shows up as a quick fix. You sell unpaid invoices, get cash upfront, and keep operations moving. On paper, it sounds simple.
In reality, not all factoring providers treat clients fairly. Some businesses end up locked into long contracts, paying far more than expected, or struggling to leave once problems start. I’ve seen owners go in for short term relief and come out with long term damage to their margins, client relationships, and credit standing.
This article answers a straightforward question early on. What are the worst factoring companies to work with? The answer depends on patterns, not just isolated complaints. Things like unclear pricing, aggressive collections, rigid terms, and poor customer support tend to show up again and again.
Below, I break down ten legitimate factoring firms that are often criticized by customers and industry reviewers. These companies are real players in the invoice financing space, but many clients report experiences that raise serious concerns. This is not about naming scams. It’s about pointing out risk so you can make smarter funding decisions.
10 Poorly Rated Factoring Companies That Businesses Often Regret Working With
Before diving into each company, it helps to see them side by side. The table below summarizes common issues reported by customers across multiple industries such as trucking, staffing, manufacturing, and small service businesses.
| Factoring Company | Primary Market | Common Complaints | Typical Contract Issues |
| BlueVine | Small businesses | Account freezes, sudden policy changes | Rigid verification rules |
| Fundbox | Small businesses | Automated denials, limited support | Short repayment windows |
| OnDeck | SMEs | High effective fees | Daily or weekly repayments |
| Kabbage | Small businesses | Account shutdowns, poor communication | Variable terms |
| TCI Business Capital | B2B companies | Slow funding, strict requirements | Long term commitments |
| RTS Financial | Trucking | Fee stacking, fuel card issues | Hard to exit agreements |
| Riviera Finance | B2B companies | Customer service delays | Long contracts |
| Porter Freight Funding | Trucking | Funding delays, reserves held | Aggressive contract terms |
| Triumph Business Capital | Trucking and logistics | Complex fee structures | Cross collateralization |
| Apex Capital | Trucking | Hidden fees, contract disputes | Lengthy termination process |
The sections below explain why these companies are often flagged by clients and what business owners commonly experience once they sign on.
BlueVine
BlueVine markets itself as a flexible cash flow partner for small businesses. Many owners sign up expecting fast invoice advances with clear pricing. The issues usually start after onboarding.
One frequent complaint involves sudden account reviews. Businesses report having funding paused or accounts frozen with little warning. This can happen after a single invoice dispute or a customer paying late. When payroll or fuel bills depend on that cash, even a short delay causes real damage.
Another issue is communication. Clients often describe slow responses when problems arise. Support is mostly digital, which works fine until something goes wrong. When it does, getting a clear answer or timeline becomes difficult.
From a cost perspective, the advertised rates often look reasonable. The real cost increases when funding interruptions force businesses to seek emergency alternatives. That indirect cost is rarely considered upfront but hits hard in practice.
Fundbox
Fundbox operates more like automated invoice financing than traditional factoring. It appeals to small businesses that want quick approvals without heavy paperwork. The downside of automation shows up fast.
Many users report sudden denials or reduced credit limits without explanation. Because decisions are algorithm driven, there’s little room for human review. If your business has seasonal swings or irregular invoices, this can become a recurring issue.
Repayment terms are another concern. Fundbox typically requires weekly payments over short periods. This structure can strain cash flow instead of easing it, especially if customers pay slower than expected.
Customer support is often described as limited. When funding issues arise, businesses may find themselves stuck between automated emails and generic responses, with no clear way to resolve urgent problems.
OnDeck
OnDeck is better known for short term business loans, but many clients experience similar issues whether they use loans or invoice based products.
The most common complaint is cost. While OnDeck discloses fees, the effective annual cost can be far higher than expected once daily or weekly repayments are factored in. For businesses with tight margins, this repayment structure can feel relentless.
Another issue is sales pressure. Some owners report being encouraged to take larger amounts than initially planned. This increases repayment obligations and risk, especially during slower months.
OnDeck funding can work in very specific situations, but businesses that rely on steady invoice payments often find the structure mismatched to their real cash flow patterns.
Kabbage
Kabbage built its reputation on fast access to working capital. After its acquisition by American Express, many small businesses noticed changes in how accounts were handled.
A common issue reported is account shutdowns. Businesses sometimes wake up to find credit lines reduced or closed with minimal explanation. This often happens during internal reviews or broader policy changes.
Communication is another weak point. When accounts are flagged, getting a detailed reason or appeal process can be frustrating. For owners relying on predictable funding, this uncertainty creates risk.
Kabbage’s model relies heavily on real time data connections to bank accounts and accounting software. If those connections change or show temporary dips, funding decisions can change overnight.
TCI Business Capital
TCI Business Capital focuses on traditional B2B factoring, including manufacturing and distribution. While some clients report stable long term relationships, others raise concerns about rigidity.
One issue involves qualification standards. TCI often requires strong debtor credit and detailed documentation. Businesses that pass onboarding may still face funding delays if invoices fall outside strict criteria.
Contracts can also be lengthy. Clients report multi year agreements with limited flexibility. Exiting early may involve fees or notice periods that aren’t fully understood at signing.
For companies needing adaptable short term cash support, this rigidity can feel restrictive rather than supportive.
RTS Financial
RTS Financial is well known in the trucking industry. It offers factoring, fuel cards, and back office services. Many owner operators sign up hoping for an all in one solution.
Complaints often focus on fees. Beyond the base factoring rate, clients report additional charges tied to fuel cards, transaction processing, and reserves. Over time, these costs add up and reduce net payouts.
Another issue involves contract exit. Truckers describe difficulty leaving the agreement, even after paying off balances. Notice periods and administrative hurdles can delay the transition to another provider.
Customer service reviews are mixed. Some praise dedicated reps, while others report long waits and inconsistent answers during disputes.
Riviera Finance
Riviera Finance is a long established factoring company serving various industries. Longevity, however, does not always equal flexibility.
Clients often mention slow response times compared to newer digital providers. Funding may take longer, especially during high volume periods or internal reviews.
Contract length is another concern. Riviera typically favors longer commitments, which may not suit startups or seasonal businesses. Early termination can be costly or time consuming.
For companies that value personal relationships and don’t mind slower processes, Riviera may work. For others, the pace and structure feel outdated.
Porter Freight Funding
Porter Freight Funding focuses heavily on trucking and freight brokers. The company promotes fast onboarding and industry specific knowledge.
The main complaints involve funding delays and reserve handling. Some truckers report invoices marked as funded but payouts delayed due to internal checks or customer payment issues.
Reserves held against invoices can also be a source of frustration. Businesses sometimes struggle to get clear explanations for when reserves will be released.
Contract terms are another sticking point. Clients report aggressive language that favors the funder, making disputes difficult to resolve without legal help.
Triumph Business Capital
Triumph Business Capital operates under a large financial group and serves logistics, staffing, and B2B companies. Its scale brings both benefits and drawbacks.
One recurring concern is complexity. Fee structures, reserve accounts, and cross collateralization clauses can be hard to understand without professional advice. Smaller businesses often underestimate how these terms affect cash flow.
Another issue is flexibility. Changes to funding limits or terms may happen as part of portfolio reviews, leaving clients scrambling to adjust.
While Triumph has strong systems, businesses that value simplicity and transparency may feel overwhelmed.
Apex Capital
Apex Capital is another major name in trucking finance. Many owner operators start with Apex early in their careers.
Complaints often focus on hidden or poorly explained fees. These may include charges tied to collections, paperwork, or early termination. Over time, the effective cost of factoring becomes higher than expected.
Contract disputes are also common in reviews. Some clients report difficulty ending agreements even after fulfilling obligations.
Customer service experiences vary widely. Some reps are helpful and responsive, while others leave clients waiting during urgent situations.
For broader coverage across finance and consumer services, visit our homepage.
Conclusion
Factoring can solve real cash flow problems, but the provider you choose matters more than most business owners realize at the start. The companies discussed here are legitimate and widely used, yet they appear frequently in complaints because of patterns that repeat across industries.
The biggest risks usually come from unclear pricing, inflexible contracts, aggressive collections, and poor communication when things go wrong. These issues don’t always show up during the sales process. They appear later, when your business depends on steady funding and quick answers.
If you’re considering invoice financing, read contracts slowly, ask how exits work, and calculate real costs beyond the headline rate. Cash today should not cost you control tomorrow.
Find The 10 Worst Credit Card Companies
Frequently Asked Questions
How can a factoring contract hurt my business even if funding seems affordable at first
Many factoring agreements look manageable when you focus only on the advance rate. The problems usually surface in the fine print. Long notice periods, personal guarantees, minimum volume clauses, and reserve holdbacks can quietly limit your control. If your customer mix changes or sales slow down, those terms can turn a helpful arrangement into a financial strain.
Is factoring riskier for trucking and freight businesses compared to other industries
Trucking businesses face higher risk mainly because margins are thin and cash flow is fuel dependent. When factoring fees stack with fuel card charges, transaction costs, and delayed reserve releases, profit shrinks quickly. One delayed payout can mean missed fuel stops or late driver payments, which is why carrier focused factoring needs extra scrutiny.
What warning signs should I look for before signing a factoring agreement
A few red flags tend to show up early. Vague answers about exit terms, reluctance to share a full fee schedule, pressure to sign quickly, or contracts that allow unilateral changes should make you pause. If the sales pitch feels smooth but written terms feel restrictive, trust the paperwork over the promise.
Can factoring damage relationships with my customers
Yes, it can. Some factoring companies handle collections aggressively or communicate poorly with your customers. This may confuse them or make your business look unstable. If your customers are sensitive to how invoices are handled, the wrong factoring partner can strain long standing relationships.
What alternatives should I consider before choosing invoice factoring
Before committing, many businesses explore business lines of credit, short term working capital loans, or negotiated payment terms with customers. Even adjusting billing cycles or offering small early payment discounts can improve cash flow. Factoring should usually be a last option, not the first one you reach for.
